Questions before answers
Sage pushes recall, prediction, and explanation before it fills in missing pieces.
SageSage runs inside Claude Code and turns study into active recall, Socratic coaching, verified explanations, spaced review, and durable local learning records.
SM-2
SRS scheduling
Local
learning files
6
specialist agents
Real Session
/sage asynchronous programming
Sage
You said the caller waits for the await to complete. I won't tell you if that's right — predict: log 3, call foo(), log 4, where foo logs 1, awaits, then logs 2.
Learner
3, 1, 4, 2 — the code before the await is synchronous, but 4 still logs before 2.
Sage
Right — and that contradicts your own model. If the caller waited, 4 would come after 2. await suspends the function, not the caller.
System
Weak Spot WS-3 logged. Card scheduled. Savepoint will resume at the asyncio contrast.
Demo
Every step below is from one real first Sage Session on asynchronous programming: a fresh start, verified curriculum, a wrong prediction, three Weak Spots, six verified Cards, and a Savepoint. The terminal lines are quotes; each file panel summarises an Artifact that Session actually wrote.
From a real first Session — condensed, not staged.
A fresh Learning Root: no prior topics, nothing assumed. Sage maps your territory from your own self-report.
/sage asynchronous programming
Fresh start confirmed — let's map your learning territory before I build a plan.
I've used callbacks, promises, and async/await in JS and Python, and asyncio — but a lot of the time I wasn't sure what the order of execution was.
Your real gap isn't syntax — it's the model. You can write async/await; you can't yet predict what runs when.
Anchor language set to JavaScript. No prior topics found — starting fresh.
Prior topics
fresh startNone — this is a fresh Learning Root
Overlaps with
none— nothing to cross-reference yet
Starting point
mappedBuilt from the learner's self-report, not an assumed baseline
Why Sage
A normal chat can feel productive while leaving no durable trace. Sage turns each Session into evidence: what you recalled, where you struggled, what must return, and where to resume.
Sage pushes recall, prediction, and explanation before it fills in missing pieces.
Cards are scheduled with an SRS engine so hard-won concepts come back before they fade.
Claims, examples, and card answers are verified before Sage commits them to your learning record.
Plans, journals, Knowledge Maps, Cards, Weak Spots, and Savepoints live as local markdown and JSON.
Install
Install the plugin, choose a Learning Root on first run, then start a Topic with a single slash command.
/plugin marketplace add 0-BSCode/sage
/plugin install sage@sage
/sage async programmingFAQ
Sage is for serious self-learners who use Claude Code and want active coaching, durable recall, and a record of what they have actually mastered.
Each Topic gets local Artifacts such as a plan, journal entries, a Knowledge Map, Cards, Weak Spots, Coach Errors, metrics, and Savepoints.
Yes. Every Session ends with a Savepoint, and resume starts by loading prior Artifacts, due Cards, active Weak Spots, and the next step.
Your learning data stays on your machine in human-readable markdown and JSON under your configured Learning Root.
No. The coaching loop is topic-agnostic, though verification is strongest for technical subjects with authoritative sources.
Sage is designed for deeper sessions and subagent work, so the Max plan is recommended for the smoothest experience.